Cricket is a sport deeply rooted in tradition, with a rich history that spans centuries. However, as the game evolves, some cricket rules implemented by the International Cricket Council (ICC) have come under scrutiny.
In this article, we will explore five cricket rules that ICC should consider eliminating. These rules of cricket, although once relevant, may no longer align with the modern game or impede its progress. Let’s delve into the cricket rules that require reevaluation and potential elimination.
Tied Super Over:
What are the chances of a World Cup Final resulting in a tie, followed by a tie in the Super Over as well? According to the current ICC regulations and the official cricket rules, if the Super Over ends in a tie, the team with the higher number of boundaries wins the match.
This is similar to how a football team can win the World Cup by having more ball possession after a penalty shootout ends in a tie. It shows that scoring boundaries is really important in cricket, just like keeping the ball more in football.
One Free Hit For Two Consecutive No Balls:
In cricket rules, there is a provision that puts batsmen at a disadvantage when a bowler delivers two consecutive no-balls, but the batsman is granted only one free hit instead of two. Let’s delve deeper into this.
According to the rules for cricket, if a bowler bowls a no-ball, the subsequent ball is considered a free hit, ensuring that the batsman cannot be dismissed. However, if the bowler bowls another no-ball immediately after the previous one, the batsman is only given one free hit opportunity.
Boundary Line Rule:
In cricket matches, there have been many instances where players attempt to prevent a six by jumping into the boundary area, throwing the ball back into play without touching the ground outside, and catching it again. These catches are considered incredible displays of athleticism. However, the cricket rules pertaining to such catches are unfair to the batsman.
For example, in football, a goal is awarded as soon as the ball touches the goal line, regardless of whether it goes into the net at the back. Similarly, in cricket matches, if a batsman makes an effort to prevent the ball from crossing the boundary line in any way, it should be acknowledged, and the boundary should be given.
Decisions Based on Soft Signal
The lack of clear reasoning behind the soft signal in cricket rules is truly perplexing. Initially introduced for disputed catches, it aimed to address situations where camera images create doubts about clean catches, giving priority to on-field umpires for decision-making.
However, the unintended consequence is that umpires often rely on players’ immediate reactions during disputed catches, making it challenging to overturn decisions without conclusive evidence. This is where the TV umpire, equipped with multiple camera angles, should play a crucial role in determining borderline catches.
Over Limit For Bowlers in ODIs and T20Is:
Batsmen have no restriction on the number of overs they can bat, while bowlers are limited. For instance, in T20 matches, bowlers can bowl a maximum of four overs, and in ODI matches, they are allowed to bowl a maximum of ten overs. These long-standing rules of cricket need to be reconsidered or modified by the primary governing bodies.
Although completely removing the rule is unlikely, the governing bodies can address the issue by revising the specific part concerning the limit. For example, they could increase the number of overs that bowlers are allowed to bowl, providing more flexibility within the rules of cricket.
Cricket is a sport that continues to evolve, and it is crucial for the ICC to adapt its rules to reflect the modern game. By re-evaluating and potentially eliminating certain rules for cricket, ICC can ensure a fair and enjoyable experience for players and spectators alike.
What other rules do you think should be omitted? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
news via inbox
Nulla turp dis cursus. Integer liberos euismod pretium faucibua